Sunday, February 24, 2013

Colombia Free Trade Agreements cost: the short run case

Colombia signed many Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) in the last years, for instance the FTAs with Mexico, Chile, Canada and The United States. Local government broadcast the potential benefits from these FTAs as the economic theory pointed, the government speech is Colombia will increase her exports in those products that show competitive advantage such as textiles, fruits, meat  and other low added value goods. But public authorities do not broadcast the FTAs costs. As everybody knows, when a country faces FTAs, she has to be ready for employees migration from those low productive economic sectors  to those high productive sectors that can be competitive in this global economy. This transition will take time and its cost can be measured in people under unemployment state. Through econometric model called Vector Autoregression (VAR) one can forecast the cost of FTAs in about 4,000 unemployed in the next 4 years that means a total unemployment of 2.3 million in the next 4 years. To make this transition soft, Colombia can invest in no tradable goods such as infrastructure and public transport such as underground for main cities while manufacture sector fix their cost through investing in technology to be competitive in this global economy.


Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist


Colombia has signed many Free Trade Agreements (FTA) in the last years, some of them are with European Free Trade Associations (EFTA) enforced in 2011, North Triangle Countries enforced 2009-2010, Canada enforced in 2011, Chile enforced in 2009, Mexico enforced in 1995 to 2006 and The United States enforced in 2012. The colombian exports' value to these countries was US$27.1 million in 2011 that meant 48.7% of total exports, moreover exports to The United Estates was US$21.9 million that meant 38.5% of colombian exports. Colombian imports from these countries reached US$29.5 million in 2011 that meant 54% of total colombian imports, therefore Colombia showed a trade deficit with her main trade partners in 2011.

Main goods exported, imported and imports cycle

As it was pointed above, Colombia imported more than she exported in 2011 from her main trade partners. Through the FTAs Colombia will export crude oil, coal, minerals, coffee, plastics (mainly polymers), flowers, sugar and fruits (mainly bananas), these goods show a competitive advantage due to low local cost of production, high volume of mineral resources and geographical location, moreover the value of these products reached 83.8% of total colombian exports in 2011 where crude oil, coal and other minerals shared with 71.2% of total colombian exports. On the other hand, Colombia will import through FTAs computers, cars, machines, mineral processed, aircrafts, plastics and organic chemicals, these goods shared with 55.2% of total colombian imports in 2011. As one can see Colombia exports low added value goods while she imports high valued goods. 

Figure 1 shows the colombian imports cycle and the main dates according to economic crisis, as one can see Colombia increases her imports after economic crisis and these imports showed a higher pick as time pass. The main conclusion is Colombia does not take crisis time to improve her industrial sector as it has to be, the point is business men and entrepreneurs have to invest in new technology while economic crisis is and they have to take advantage of the learned process while economic boom is. 

Figure 1. Colombia imports cycle 1977-2012
(quarterly data)

Source: Government Bureau of Statistics. (DANE and DNP) .

FTAs and short run unemployment

Colombia faces a chronic (long run) unemployment issue as figure 2 shows, the blue line is the unemployment rate and the red line is its trend, as one can see Colombia has faced an unemployment rate between 6.9% and 20.5% since 1977 (quarterly data), therefore there is an economic policy issue to sort out through infrastructure investment and social programs investment such as education, health and better technology for basic services as water, thought these  investments the chronic unemployment rate can be face a decline.

Figure 2. Colombia unemployment rate and its trend 1977-2012
( % quarterly data)

Source: Government Bureau of Statistics. (DANE and DNP).

Now, if one pays attention to short run unemployment rate issue, it means unemployment rate reached by economic crisis and economic openness (FTAs), one realizes that colombian unemployment rate will increases in the next 4 years due to economic openness in about 0.07% and 0.18%, it means the economic openness will bring a cost between 1,500 and 4,000 people in unemployment state as figure 3 shows, the total unemployed (long run plus short run unemployed) will be around 2.3 million of people in the next 4 years. After this 4 years colombian unemployment rate will come back to her long run trend that is between 7.8% and 10.0%.

Figure 3. Response on unemployment rate cycle due to imports’ shock*
(% quarterly data, 50 periods forward)

*Impulse: Imports cycle. Response: Unemployment rate cycle. 
Shaded area: maximum and minimum response value under 95%  confidence level.
VAR model with Unemployment rate cycle; PIB cycle; and imports cycle as endogenous and exogenous variables. Six lags are taken in the model.
Source: Stata 12.1 own calculations.

The conclusions are Colombia produces primary goods and imports high added value goods, moreover this country shows a trade deficit with her main trade partners and the FTAs signed in the last years will cost about 4,000 people in unemployment state. To mitigate this cost, high investments in infrastructure sector that promotes trade can be done.

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Economists as bartenders: the famous colombian cocktail and its hangover

It is not usual that economists mix up cocktails, it is a great job for bartenders, however there is an attempt to make it. The ingredients are cocaine, coal, crude oil, a sprinkle of government defense spending and the final secret touch called banana. The mix of all them since 1971 gave as a result an exotic tropical drink that was enjoyed and well tasted by few greedy people but a hangover for Colombian society of GINI index of 0.548; corruption place on 94; unemployment rate of 9.6%; population in poverty state of 34.1% of total population and homicide rate of 36 per thousand of inhabitants. To avoid the hard hangover, private sector and government have to work on legalizing production and consumption of cocain under well thinking scheme of monopoly;  high taxes (royalties and taxes on profits for primary economic sectors) and strong justice sector for those who abuse of Human Rights.


Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist


This note deals with the main products that take Colombia towards conflictive society, it means an income distribution measure through GINI coefficient of 0.548 in 2011; a corruption place on 94 out of 174 in 2012 where the most corrupted is Somalia on 174 place; unemployment rate of 9.6% in 2012; population in poverty reached 34.1% of total population in 2011 (Colombia has 48 million of people); 61.9% of total population asked for subsides through social program called SISBEN in 2011; and a homicide rate of 36 per thousand of inhabitants in 2011. The following products can be mixed as a cocktail and the final result is the above social indicators with a bitter flavor and painful hangover.

Cocaine production

Colombia is one of main producers of cocaine around the World, the others are Peru and Bolivia mainly. Colombia went form 2 tonnes of production in 1971 to 695 tonnes in 2001 and 345 in 2011 as figure 1 shows, it means an annual average growth of 15.3% per year. This cocaine production used to share 1.7% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Colombia in 2000 and nowadays it shares 0.4% of colombian GDP. Cocaine value chain is around Colombia: production is mainly in 4 regions out of 33 in Colombia: Cauca, Nariño, Valle and Chocó but the consumption has been spreading in deep around whole Colombia since 1995, therefore cocaine production is a profitable business either local and abroad (cocaine can be taken as monopoly market with price discrimination according to city, for instance in Colombia is cheaper than in Europe or USA). 

Figure 1. Cocaine production in Colombia 1971-2011
 (annual metric tonnes)

Source: Castillo, F. 1987; Pizarro, E. 2004; Henderson,J. 2012; United Nations. Coca survey issues from 2003 to 2011.

The attractiveness of cocaine in this cocktail is the power to take out colombians producers from poverty state in few years. However, there is a hangover due to drink it, the consumption is dangerous for health till point to pass away. Therefore, there is an economic-medical problem that must be sorted through education, monopoly production through government supervision, legal doses according to medical research and legal distribution through boots and nigh clubs. 

Coal and crude oil production 

Colombia has 7 years of crude oil reserves (the rate of extraction was about 900 thousand of barrels per day in 2011-12); 14 years of natural gas reserves; and 79 years of coal reserves (the extraction was  86 million tonnes in 2011 as figure 2 shows). Crude oil and coal are exported mainly through foreign firms such as Pacific Rubiales, OXY, Petrtobras, Drumond, Cerro Matoso (bnpbilliton) and the local one Ecopetrol. The crude oil, gas and coal’s value added is about 9.0% of GDP in Colombia. The big issue is most of their profits are repatriated and Colombia does not get the benefits from making final products made of crude oil or mining products. Moreover the government taking from this activities is low, in crude oil is about 40% of total income and firms profits is about 36% of total income, the expected share is 15% as a profits and 61% as government taking.

Figure 2. Coal production in Colombia 1971-2011
 (annual thousand of tonnes)

Source: Bureau of Statistics (UPME, DNP and Mine department).

The attractiveness of mining sector in this cocktail is the power to take out economic resources without fair distribution, moreover a sprinkle of local government corruption let getting high unfair income distribution, high poverty and high unemployment. 

Government defense spending

Colombia spends high resources in defense, most of them are taking to fight against the guerrilla called FARC and cocaine cartels in the pacific region. The amount of economic resources can be counted in 3.6% of GDP in 2011, one can see on figure 3 the increasing trend in defense spending as a share of Colombia GDP, moreover the defense administrative spending was not counted in this percentage, if one takes into account this spending, the total defense spending doubles the value, it meant about 6.5% of GDP in 2011.

Figure 3. Defense government spending in Colombia 1971-2011*
 (% GDP)

Source: Bureau of Statistics (DANE, DNP and Finance department).

The attractiveness of defense spending in this cocktail is the power to kill colombians with poor education and young. Colombia reached 36 homicides per thousands of people in 2011. 

The secret touch, Banana production

Colombia was the second exporter of bananas around the World after Ecuador in 2011. The volume exported was 229 thousand of tonnes in 1971 and 1.9 million of tonnes in 2011 as figure 4 shows, it means an annual average growth rate of 4.7% between 1971 and 2011. Banana production in Colombia can be taken as enclave economy due to firms who grow bananas used to pay low salaries; make their own law till point they abuse Human Rights (for instance in years 1928 and 2004); taxes to government and the added value to economy are low. One waits that this sector invest in technology to develop other activities in Colombia, for instance development in  energy sector, public transport such as underground and aircrafts and so.

Figure 4. Banana exported by Colombia 1971-2011
 (thousand of tonnes)

Source: Bureau of Statistics (Agronet), FAO and UN.

The attractiveness of banana sector in this cocktail is the power to abuse of Human Rights and unfair income distribution. 

Then, there is the economic cocktail made of cocaine, coal, crude oil, defense spending and the secret touch called banana that Colombian enjoy every day without government attention on its hangover.

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Flowers from Colombia, the chance to be competitive in a global economy


Colombia is one of main countries that exports flowers to the World, however this country has problems in her volume of production due to lack of economies of scale. Colombia used to export 15.7% of total flowers in the World market in 2002 but nowadays she shares 13.8%, in terms of volume she sold 203 thousand of tonnes in 2011 when she used to sell 231 thousand of tonnes. Moreover, this market  is highly subsided through exchange rate devaluation and direct money through government bodies until point this sector showed an increase in employment from 89,210 places in 2002 to 138,512 places in 2011, therefore this sector shows diseconomies of scale (as they add people to production they produce less!!!). The flowers harvest in Colombia is through whole year but mainly on february, may and july, through these months the volume is about 20 thousand of tonnes per month, one can be tempted to point that Colombia can improve her production to 25 thousand of tonnes per month through whole year if private and government sectors invest to improve flower productivity. If Colombia does not pay attention to this issue, her flowers sector will get same situation of coffee sector, this sector used to pull Colombia economy, nowadays this sector is in deep crisis due to global competitiveness. 



Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist


Colombia is one of main countries that exports flowers to the world, this country shared 13.8% of total flowers exports in 2011, nevertheless this share showed a decline since 2002 when she used to share 16.3% and 15.7% in 2007 as figure 1 shows. Colombia is on the second place of main exporters of flowers after Netherlands and before Ecuador and Kenya but she can miss this place due to lack of economies of scale. Colombia exported 232 thousand of tonnes in 2007 and 203 thousand of tonnes in 2011, one can be tempted to say that it is due to local currency appreciation but Ecuador and European Union face same issue, therefore it is not the issue.

Figure 1. Flowers exports by country 2001 - 2011
(%)

Source: United Nations Data.

Colombia shows a decline trend of her flowers’ exports in total exports of Colombia, this sector used to share 5.68% in total exports before beginning of 2002 but after this year this sector dropped dramatically as figure 2 shows. By 2002 the employment taken by flowers sector was 89,210 and it increased to 138,512 in 2011 and it is expected to reaches 140,518 in 2012, therefore there is less production and more employees in this sector, one can call this situation diseconomies of scale and a sector that gets huge subsides to be in the market, this subsides are through exchange rate devaluation and direct money through government agencies. 
Figure 2. Colombian flowers as a share of total goods exports 1970-2011
(%)

Source: Central Bank Colombia and Bureau of Statistics (DANE and DNP).

Private sector and government have to work hard to get out of this flowers declining production, a target can be invest to improve flowers productivity in order to get economies of scale. This hard work can let lower flowers’ prices, then they can be competitive in this global economy. If Colombia does not pay attention to this issue, Ecuador and Kenya will take her place as it was in the coffee sector with Viet Nam and Germany. 

Colombia produce and export flowers mainly on february, may and july as figure 3 shows, the average volume for those months are 20 thousand of tonnes, of course through other months there is flower production but in less amount, it is about 13 thousand tonnes, therefore a competitive business ( economies of scale) can let Colombia export 25 thousand of  tonnes per month through whole year and keep employment working to improve production.

Figure 3. Flowers production in Colombia 2000-2012
(monthly data, tonnes)

Source: Bureau of Statistics Colombia (DIAN) and United Nations Data.


Flowers production in Colombia 2000-2012
(yealy tonnes)

Year
Volume (tonnes)
2000
169,640
2001
178,910
2002
189,366
2003
196,231
2004
192,076
2005
222,561
2006
223,347
2007
231,934
2008
221,269
2009
205,400
2010
220,018
2011
203,690
2012*
190,440
* Until November.

Source: Bureau of Statistics Colombia (Agronet) and UN. 




Sunday, February 3, 2013

Rush momentary policies in Colombia: nominal exchange rate depreciation of 8.7% by force


Nowadays most of World countries face a nominal exchange rate depreciation, therefore it is time to invest and be more productive in order to reach economies of scale as global economy demand. However, there are developing countries that try to depreciate nominal exchange rate to be competitive, it means they have a lazy industrial sector (mainly in those sectors which export products) or they want to take advantage of government lack of information. Colombia is in the group that want to depreciate nominal exchange rate by force (through expansive monetary policy), this country wants a nominal exchange rate of Col$1,950 per dollar when market says it is Col1,778 per dollar. This depreciation by force can bring higher inflation rate and again real appreciation through higher prices. To be competitive in this global economy, industrial sector needs to work hard in improving their technologies to reach economies of scale, now it is time to hire foreign and local advices and buy the latest generation of capital.



Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist,
e-mail: zhumber@gmail.com


The nominal exchange rate (US$ in terms of local currencies) around the world showed an average grow rate of -2.6% between 2012 and 2013, it means an appreciation, of course there were countries which faced depreciation, they are about 15% of 52 countries such as Argentina which faced a depreciation of 15% and India with a depreciation of 2.9%.  The first of these two countries can get huge economic cost in the long run due to this policy, for India case, this policy can bring economic growth in the long run, the issue is the first one does not face economies of scale in most of her products  but India does. 

Figure 1. Nominal and real exchange rates Index in Colombia 1980-2011
(adjusted by maximum value)


Source: World Bank.

Now, the issue is how countries are dealing this appreciation. There are countries which let free floating the nominal exchange rate and they do not work in improving their productivity through better technologies that let reaching lower prices, in this group are Colombia and Venezuela. In Colombia case the appreciation of nominal and real exchange rate e=(P/EP*) are showed in figure 1, the main fact is Colombia prices are not competitive due to as nominal exchange rate (E) goes down the local index price (P) goes up, moreover index prices from foreign goods are competitive (P*), it means foreign prices show a negative growth rate to be competitive, for instance Peru shows a stable real exchange rate (it means the nominal exchange rate appreciation is neutralized with lower local prices), other country which shows same situation is Chile as figure 2 shows, the nominal exchange rate (blue line) showed an appreciation but the real exchange rate is stable, it means economies of scale. Both Peru and Chile are competitive at international trade market, therefore their exports and GDP shows strong growth. 


Figure 2. Nominal and real exchange rates Index in Chile 1980-2011
(adjusted by maximum value)

Source: World Bank.

Tray to be competitive through a depreciate local currency can be a big mistake, figure 3 shows the Big Mac index, most of developing countries face a real exchange rate depreciation (negative numbers), therefore any attempt to depreciate will not be successful due to their currency are not as strong as US dollar as it is pointed below. 


Figure 3. Big Mac Index 2013 (January)*

*Highlighted overvalued.
Source: The Economist and Wolfram.

Any monetary intervention is useless: Colombia case of Col$1.950 per dollar.

As was mentioned before, most of countries face a nominal exchange rate appreciation, therefore if a country tries to make a monetary policy to get a depreciation, it will be useless in the long run and expensive in terms of high inflation unless this country would has strong currency and productivity as the United Staes does. Colombia government wants to depreciate her currency from Col$1,776 per dollar to Col$1,950 per dollar and the result can be disappointed in terms of economic growth. Here is the scenario that can be if government tries to depreciate local currency by force: if Colombia government would buy huge amount of dollars in the local market, then nominal exchange rate will face a depreciation from Col$1,776 per dollar to Col$1,950 per dollar as government wants but foreigners and locals speculators can make an arbitrage strategy (short run capital flows), for instance speculators go to Peru or Chile (web transactions) and they spend Col$100,000 buying local currencies, for instance New Peruvian Sol (Per$); speculator can buy Per$141.80 with Col$100,000, then they would spent this peruvian money in dollars; US$53.66 with Per$141.80; and finally they sell these dollars in Colombia in Col$1,950 per dollar that means Col$104,637, it means a profit of Col$4,637 if speculators spent Col$100,000 at the beginning of transaction, therefore if speculators are a set of big financial enterprises, they will get huge profits and colombian government will get losses due to government has to buy dollars at higher prices Col$1,950 per dollar to keep Col$ depreciated.

This transaction can be done in less than a day (seconds in the best of scenarios). Moreover this government monetary strategy at the end means more local money supply that bring high inflation rates and a real exchange rate appreciation  again due to high local prices. The OECD ( The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) has pointed the negative to tray to depreciate local currencies at this moment, from my point of view this this assessment is logic due to developing countries have to improve their technology and productivity to be competitive in the global market through lower prices and product differentiation, nowadays there is a monopolistic competition in the global market and economies of scale make the difference instead to be competitive through nominal exchange rate depreciation.

Note: Nominal exchange rates were taken from official financial webpages.