Sunday, November 24, 2013

Getting more coffee market inside of competitive World market: Colombia case

Colombia coffee sector has lost World market since 1945. Since this year government has given subsides to coffee sector to be competitive in a competitive World market as many local newspapers pointed; therefore, it is not a current issue. Of course, Colombia has supplied important volumes of coffee to the World; for instance, when Brazil faced bad weather between 1976 and 1980. However, this loss of market is because the number of countries that produce coffee went from 9 in 1914 to 79 in 2012; moreover, the types of coffee increased, there is not one type of Robusta and Arabica, there are more than 37 types of coffee where Colombia produces few types. In addition, the breakdown of Coffee Pact in 1989 increased the World competition in the coffee market.  Many private and government researches point the high internal logistic costs (internal transport, storage and international trade management), the high inputs costs, the internal war and the increase of coca crops as the causes of coffee market lost, and they have partially the reason. If coffee farmers face a better political environment and low inputs prices, so they can be more competitive. However, the main cause of Colombia lost share in World coffee market is the competition and lack of suppling many varieties of coffees. To solve this issue, farmers and international trade firms in Colombia have to work on: 1. Farmers have improve their technology to reach economies of scale; it means new types of coffee (beans that let getting economies of scale), so it is a work between local researchers and farmers supported by government.  2. Colombia has to supply many varieties of coffee beans; it means, farmers and government have to invest in research and development to get new and better varieties of beans in new regions in Colombia. 3. Finally, government has to promote a Coffee Traders Association where they can reach lower logistic cost, and government has to regulate the farmers’ coffee price through a price band or minimum price which can be setting under a mathematical formula.

Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist,
Twitter: Humberto_Bernal


Colombia is an important supplier of coffee around the World; she started to produce an important volumes of coffee since second half of 1850; for producing coffee in Colombia, there were important capital invested from locals and foreigners such as germans.  However, Colombian coffee sector has shown critical economic indicators related with its competitiveness in this global economy; there are many private and government researches that point this issue; they highlight the internal logistic costs as a cause of this critical environment in coffee sector; moreover, they point the climate change as a cause of low productivity. There are others that point the internal war conflict and the increase of coca crops as a causes of this issue also. Of course, they have partially the reason, but the main cause of this loss of competitiveness is the diseconomies of scale of coffee production in a monopolistic competition market. This note shows how Colombia has lost coffee market because diseconomies of scale and hard global competition. 

The the breakdown of Coffee Pact in 1989 increased the competence in coffee market around the World, and Colombia was not ready to face it. Before 1991, Colombia faced an increasing trend in her coffee production, she went from 42 thousand of tonnes in 1915 to 971 thousand of tonnes in 1991; after this year, the coffee production showed a decline to reach 468.5 thousand of tonnes in 2012 as figure 1 shows. This dynamic can be explained by the end of Coffee Pact in 1989; this end let international coffee market follows the free market path, and increases the competence through many countries. There were periods when Colombia increased her production because weather changes in other countries; it let her taking advantages such as Brazilian coffee crisis between 1976-1980.

Figure 1. Coffee production in Colombia 1915-2012
(thousands of metric tonnes)
Source: 1915-1929: Colombian Central Bank Document 116 of 1999; 1930-1955: International Historical Statistics Palgrave; 1956-2012: Federación Nacional de Cafeteros Colombia.

The competition in coffee market is hard, so Colombia has lost global share in this product. The main countries that produced coffee between 1823 and 1914 where Indonesia, India and Brazil and 6 more included Colombia, so the market was concentrated. Between 1915 and 1945 Colombia won an important share; she reached 19.3% of total coffee World production!!! as figure 2 shows; by that year the total number of countries that produced coffee were 22; El Salvador and Guatemala began to take an important share in coffee production also. Since 1946, Colombia began to loss share because the number of countries that produce this commodity increased, so this number reached 78 countries in 1980; the main traditional coffee suppliers were Brazil, Colombia and Indonesia, and the new main coffee suppliers were Cote d Ivoire, Mexico, Ethiopia, Uganda, Philippines and so. Therefore, there were new countries form Latin America and Africa that decided to supply many varieties of coffee between 1945 and 1980. Nowadays, Colombia shares with 5.5% of total World coffee production; this low share can be explained by more  important suppliers such as Viet Nam, Peru and Honduras; the total number of countries that produce important volumes of coffee were 79 in 2011. Therefore, Colombia has lost an important coffee share because competition.

Figure 2. Colombian coffee as a share of World coffee 1915 - 2012
(%)
Source: Colombian Central Bank Document 116 of 1999; International Historical Statistics Palgrave; Federación Nacional de Cafeteros Colombia FAO.

The internal logistic costs for coffee in Colombia has not faced an important change in the last years. Logistic costs means the transport cost from farms to port, storage, administrative costs because international traders firms have to afford it to sell the coffee abroad. One can calculate this internal logistic cost through the difference between coffee FOB price and coffee farmer price in Colombia; this difference is shown in figure 3. As one can see, the average is US$1.22 per pound at 2012 prices between 1915 and 2012. Unfortunately in the last 10 years Colombia shows an increase in these logistic costs, but they are under the average cost. Therefore, there is low effort to make logistic costs competitive; to make this logistic cost competitive, government has to promote a new Coffee Traders Association and regulate the international traders firms through minimum price paid to farmers. There are approximately 80 trade firms that make this job and Federación Nacional de Cafeteros shares with 29% of the coffee traded.

Figure 3. Difference between external price and internal price for Coffee in Colombia 1915 - 2012
(US$ per pound, prices chained of 2012 )
Source: Colombian Central Bank Document 116 of 1999; Federación Nacional de Cafeteros.

Nowadays, there are 79 countries that supply coffee and many types of coffees (types of Arabica and Robusta), so the market is working under Monopolistic Competition Market. Because this increase in the number of suppliers and local diseconomies of scale, Colombia has lost market; it means a lower demand, and it is more elastic on price as figure 4 shows; the black arrow and blue arrow show this lost. Moreover, because of internal war conflict, cocaine production and lack of organization in coffee trades firms, the average cost per tonne of coffee increased as red arrow shows in figure 4; this last effect is low (marginal). 

Figure 4. Monopolistic competition in Coffee market
(Colombia case under diseconomies of scale)


P: Demand Price. MC: Marginal cost. AC: Average Cost. MI: Marginal Income. E: equilibrium.
Source: Own.

Achieving economies of scale and product variety (coffee variety) are the main objectives to work on to recover the lost market. If one takes the yearly coffee market information since 1915 to 2011 and fit them into an econometric monopolistic competition model, the results are those shown in table 1. For instance, it is a clear evidence that competition reduce External Price FOB and local farmers income in about 3.7% and 3.5% as competition index increases in 1.0% (blue results in table 1). Moreover, an increase of 1.0% in crude oil price lets an increase of coffee’s marginal cost in 0.2% (green result in table 1). The most important result is the increase of Marginal Cost in 0.2% as the volume of production increases in 1.0% (red result table 1); it means diseconomies of scale. On the other hand, under economies of scale, this red value should be zero or negative.

Table 1. Monopolistic competition in Coffee market in Colombia 1915-2011
(Model under 3SLS)

Variables
Impact
External Price:

   Coffee volume demanded
-4.0%
   USA GDP per capita
3.3%
   Competition index
-3.7%
Marginal Cost:

   Coffee volume supplied
0.2%
   Crude oil price
0.2%
   Exchange rate
-0.2%
Marginal Income:

   Coffee volume in equilibrium
-4.0%
   USA GDP per capita
3.2%
   Competition index
-3.5%
Observations
97


Results are statistical significative at 0.05 significance level.
Source: Own calculations Stata 12.1. Under Three-Stages Least Squares.

In conclusion, Colombia has faced hard coffee competition since 1945, so she has lost huge World market. The local logistic costs for coffee do not show an important changes in the last 10 years, but  these costs can be lower if there are government incentives to set a Coffee Traders Association that work on achieving it. Colombia supply few varieties of Arabica coffees, so it narrows her World market; to solve this issue, Colombians coffee farmers and researchers have to work hard to get new varieties of coffee beens that show economies of scale; they can be grown in other regions in Colombia (it can be an alternative for demobilized guerrillas and displaced people). The price for farmers (internal price) has to be regulated through formula that points the minimum price charged or a price band for farmers. The future of Colombian coffee depends on investing in research and development that let getting economies of scale through new varieties of coffee beans.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Are Colombians a xenophobic society? or are Colombians a weak democratic society?

The total number of people kidnaped in Colombia between 1964 and 2012 are between 39,059 and 58,112 cases according to different sources. The total number of foreigners kidnaped are at least 1,051 cases between 1971 and 2012, so it means a 2.7% or 1.8% of total people kidnaped in Colombia. Someone who ignores the internal political war in Colombia can conclude that colombians are a xenophobic society that does not deserve the life’s gift. Fortunately, it is not the case; Colombians are splendid hosts. The number of foreigners residents in Colombia have increased in the last 50 years until reaching at least 150 thousands in 2012. This note highlights the principal figures from foreigners kidnaped in Colombia and its decline due to meetings and Peace dialogues between government and guerrilla in Cuba.

Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist,
Twitter: Humberto_Bernal

Colombia is a country where kidnaping is an activity that news broadcast everyday. Moreover, Colombia is on the first places of countries that face this social disease. The issue is such that there are many sources where people can find information on people kidnaped in Colombia; for instance in Department of Defense in Colombia, Department of Economic Development (DNP), Police Department, Fondolibertad, Cifras y Conceptos and Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica; these sources are the most important, but one can find information in foreign sources also. Information from these bodies is not equal; for instance, the total people kidnaped is between 39,059 and 58,112 cases through 1964 to 2012 according to source. Therefore, it shows the complexity of this issue. However and fortunately, there is information to remember us the violation of Human Rights in Colombia, country that is part of the World. Moreover, this information lets us remember why we have to protect the Human Rights. This note deals the kidnaping facing by foreigners in Colombia during 1971 to 2012. I have written about this issue in my previous notes, but the information was not properly dealt (see my note of November 3th of 2013). Therefore, I decides to go in deep on this issue to make it clear.

Colombia is a country that has faced many cases of people kidnaped, but they show a decline since meetings in Cuba took place. People  that have been kidnapped in Colombia is about 58,112 between 1964 and 2012; some of these people has been released, others paid to be released, others escaped and others died in captivity!!!. Figure 1 shows the rate of kidnaping in Colombia per 100 thousand of inhabitants; as one can see, the worst period was between 1978 and 2010; the average rate was 4.6 per year; it means per 100 thousand of people, there were approximately 5 people kidnaped each year; it is fair to remember that Colombia has approximately 47 million inhabitants. However, since meetings between Government and Guerrilla started, the number of people kidnapped showed a deep decline fortunately; the rates were 0.7 in 2011 and 2012; it means 305 cases in 2011 and 305 cases in 2012. Moreover, according to Fundación País Libre, FARC did not kidnap any foreigner in 2012.

Figure 1. Kidnaping rate in Colombia 1964-2012
(rate per 100.000 inhabitants)
Source: DNP, Deprtamnet of Defence Colombia, Cifras y Conceptos, Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica, Fondolibertad.

In my previous note (November 3th of 2013), I pointed that the number of foreigners kidnaped in Colombia were at least 5,563 cases during 1971 to 2012, but, after making the proper accounts, this number is at least 1,051 cases during this period as figure 2 shows. This information comes from public data broadcasted by Cifras y Conceptos, Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica and Fundación País Libre. Since 1980, there has been at least 3 cases of foreigners kidnapped, and the worst case was in 1999 when there were 95 cases. By 2012, the foreigners kidnaped were 4.

Figure 2. Foreigners kidnapped in Colombia
1964-2012
(Number of people)
Source: Cifras y Conceptos, Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica, Fondolibertad and Fundación País Libre.

Foreigners live around whole in Colombia, but they were kidnaped around whole Colombia also. Colombia has 1,123 municipalities and at least 250 have faced  the kidnaping of a foreigner. 69% of total foreigners kidnaped between 1971 and 2012 were in small cities  or rural areas as figure 3 shows; these cities do not face high security as Bogotá, Medellín, Cali, Santa Marta, Cartagena and Cúcuta. However, the 31% of foreigners kidnaped took place in “safe” cities such as those pointed few lines above. This information highlights the big issue which Colombia has been passed through.

Figure 3. Foreigners kidnapped by municipality in Colombia 1971-2012
(Share of total foreigner kidnapped* %)
* Total Cases with information: 857 out of 1,051.
Source: Cifras y Conceptos, Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica, Fondolibertad and Fundación País Libre.

Foreigners kidnaped in Colombia has come from many countries. Figure 4 shows where foreigners kidnaped come from; They are from Venezuela with 16.9% of total foreigners kidnaped between 1971 and 2012, the Unites States with 14.6%, Italy with 6.5%, Spain with 5.5%, and Germany with 5.5%. Others come from China, Costa Rica, Aruba, Australia, Japan and so... The World has 206 countries and foreigners kidnaped in Colombia come from 60 countries!!!. It means it is a World’s problem, it is not Colombians’ problem just.

Figure 4. Foreigners kidnapped by source country in Colombia 1971-2012
(Share of total foreigner kidnapped* %)
* Total Cases with information: 1,051.
Source: Cifras y Conceptos, Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica, Fondolibertad and Fundación País Libre.

Someone who is not aware of Colombian conflict can point that Colombians are a xenophobic society that do not deserve enjoy the life’s gift, but it is not the case fortunately. Colombians enjoy being hosts; there are many films that highlight how Colombians make a big effort to make conformable foreigners’ stay in Colombia; for instance, Mi gente linda, mi gente bella. Moreover, foreigners residents in Colombia have increased in the last 50 years; there are approximately 150 thousand foreigners registered in Colombia in 2012, but this number increased to 650 thousand if foreigners not “registered” are taken into account. Therefore, why are foreigners kidnaped in Colombia?, the answer is because Colombia faces an internal political war, and this activity gives power of negotiation and finical sources for supporting this irrational political war. Therefore, we are looking forward to ending this internal war to enjoy Colombia as must be.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Banana Republic VIII: where is money going?, 49 years facing high unemployment rates and GINI above 0.5, it’s time to rethink monetary channels

Money is for making transaction easier, to make accounts easier, and to store it for future consumption. This is pointed by economic books; however, after studying the monetary theory and reading monetary cases around the World, one tends to add this function also: printing money has to be managed to achieve fair income distribution; therefore, it  is time to work on microeconomic issues about printing money.

Nowadays, there is topic about the Monetary Authorities duties. Most of Centrals Banks around the World have to look after for low inflation and fair economic development, but they put strong effort in the first duty, low inflation. Colombia is in this list, Central Bank of Colombia has been working hard to get this trophy, and they won it. However, the cost was a high unemployment rate; it was 9.6% in 2012 and 9.0% in September of 2013. In Colombia, when monetary authorities go to show their results in front of colombian Congress, they broadcast good indicators such as positive monetary supply growth rates, monetary policies that mitigate the GDP cycles, lower inflation rate and so. Of course, colombian Central Bank is full of professional of best skills; most of them have a Magister and PhD studies in many subjects, so their results have many filters to be consistent. This note shows indicators that support monetary authorities under aggregate view such as inflation, but Central Bank’s results in terms of economic development are critical. It is time to think on improving money channels (ways to supply money); to align fair economic development, money has to make their job through supporting the supply of public goods such as water, energy, transport, pensions and health. It does not mean irresponsible money supply, so it means  new channels to give the printing money. Microeconomic theory can be used to reach this target.

Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist,
Twitter: Humberto_Bernal


Central Bank in Colombia is on charge of keeping low inflation, but ensuring economic development (Art. 372 and 373 Colombia Constitution). Unfortunately, Monetary Policy has working on reducing the inflation rate without huge contribution to keep unemployment rate low. The inflation rate between 1970 and 1990 showed an annual average of 22.3% and unemployment rate showed an annual average of 10.1%; from 1991 to 2012 the annual average inflation rate showed a decline until 11.4%, but the average unemployment rate increased to 11.8%. Therefore, it is a clear evidence of laking of awareness from monetary authorities about the social cost in terms of unemployment in a country that faces unfair income distribution and high indicators of extreme poverty. This note points the efficiency of Monetary Policy in aggregate terms, but inefficiency in terms of economic development.

Monetary Policy has been mismanaged because unemployment in Colombia has been above 7.0% since 1964. From 1964 to 2000 the money supply in Colombia showed a declining trend as a share of colombian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as figure 1 shows; this share went from 10.8% in 1970 to 5.5% in 2000; it means relative fewer notes and coins to make transactions throughout this period, so people faced lacking of monetary liquidity. This economic policy brought a high unemployment rate during this period; unemployment rate was between 7.0% and 19.9%. Therefore, Monetary Authorities forgot working on fair economic development, or they did not take into account the correct economic tools to fight against poverty and unemployment. Economic development, under monetary view, means aggregate and individual impact due to monetary policy. If one  reviews the Central Bank researcher's work, one finds lot work on monetary impact on aggregate variables, mainly financial aggregate variables, but null works on monetary impact on public goods. This fact is because Central Bank just gives cheap money to financial system, and financial system works on how to make private profits with public money without its social cost!!!.

Figure 1. M1 as percentage of GDP in Colombia
 1924 - 2012
(Annual data %)

Source: Central Bank of Colombia and Bureau of Statistics Colombia (DANE). Own calculations.

Although money supply started to increase as  a share in GDP since 2001, it has not been enough to sort out unemployment rate in Colombia. Since 2001 the share of M1 (money supply) in GDP in Colombia has showed an increase; it went from 5.6% in 2001 to 11.0% in 2012; however, the unemployment rate is above of 9.6% still. The problem is the printing money has showed positive rates, but they has been lower since 2003 as figure 2 show.

Figure 2. M1 annual quarterly growth rate in Colombia 
1932 - 2013
(Data smoothed, %)

      Source: Central Bank and Bureau of Statistics Colombia.  Own calculations.

The Central Bank of Colombia shows excellent financial aggregate results, but low economic development results.The Central Bank can show excellent aggregate indicators such as positive money supply growth rates, an increasing supply money as a share of GDP; moreover, they can show that the monetary policy is contra-cycle as figure 3 shows; it means as the economy starts a downturn, the monetary authorities take an active job to mitigate it. However, their impact on economy is biased; this monetary policy goes to support private financial system mostly. Economic crisis are alerts that economic development is in danger, but just supporting the financial sector does not make strong difference; therefore, Monetary Policy have to work on key economic variables to take advantage of economic crisis. These key variables are poverty indicators, public transport, water supply, energy supply and so. 

Figure 3. Real monetary supply (M1) per capita cycle in Colombia 1932 - 2013
(quarterly data)

Source: Central Bank of Colombia and Bureau of Statistics Colombia (DANE). Own calculations.

In conclusion, Colombian Central Bank has working properly to reduce inflation rate. They know the monetary impact from macroeconomic view, and work on financial system to mitigate economic crisis. However, they do not pay enough attention to reaching economic development. Socioeconomic indicators related with income distribution are same as 49 years ago; they have changed marginally. It is a call for working on the impact of monetary supply on public goods from a microeconomic view. Of course, high corruption has to be taken as a restriction in this type of microeconomic models.

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Inflation-Unemployment policy in a country under internal war: Colombia case

Colombian unemployment rate has been between 7.0% and 19.9% in the last 49 years. This high unemployment rate is partially explained by the economic policy of inflation reduction taken since 1991 by Central Bank of Colombia. Under fair economic scenario, it would be tolerable an increasing unemployment in order to reduce the inflation rate, but it is so costly under an internal war conflict such in Colombia. Of course, the Central  Bank of Colombia made her job properly; the inflation rate faced an important reduction until reaching 2.4% in 2012, but unemployment increased to reach 9.6% in 2012. This high unemployment rate has feeded the terrorism partially because Colombia faces high unfair income distribution; people have to live on and terrorism well payed is an option in a country were security is poor. This note shows how unemployment pushed up the cases of kidnapping in Colombia during 1964 to 2012. The lesson has to be learned, Monetary Policy and Governments (central and locals) have to work hard to reduce unemployment rate for a successful Peace Meetings ending. On the other hand, in a country with low security and a bulk of population in poverty state, this type of terrorism is an alternative to live on.

Author: Humberto Bernal,  
Economist,
Twitter: Humberto_Bernal


The unemployment rate in Colombia has shown high values since decade of 1960 as figure 1 shows; this rate has been between 7.0% and 19.9%; the lowest value was reached in 1981 and the highest value was in 2000. The Central Bank’s economic policy since 1991 has been targeted to reduce the inflation rate, but it has brought high cost in terms of high unemployment rates; for instance, taking annual information since 1964 from these two variables, one finds as the inflation faces a reduction of 1.0%, the unemployment rate faces an increase of 0.14%; it means more people under unemployment state because this economic policy. Although this policy brought successful results because the inflation rate went from 32.4% in 1990 to 2.4% in 2012, the cost has been high compared with its benefits. This note highlights that inflation targeting in Colombia (get low inflation) brought costs in terms of feeding the terrorism in Colombia. Therefore, it is not advisable taking strong economic policies to reduce inflation when a country faces an internal war. 

Figure 1. Unemployment rate in Colombia 1964-2012
(%)
Red line: Average unemployment rate.
Source: Bureau of Statistics Colombia (DANE).


Kidnapping people in Colombia

Unfortunately Colombia has faced one of the highest rates of people kidnapped around the World; one can say that she takes the firsts places around the World. The number of people kidnapped in Colombia since 1964 is 52,150 people!; the number of people kidnapped increased dramatically in 1978 and 1994; the annual number of people kidnapped went from 122 cases  in 1978 to 3,706 in 2000 as figure 2 shows; unfortunately, nowadays this number is 305 per year. 

Figure 2. Total population kidnapped in Colombia 1964-2012
(Number of people, annual flow)
Source: DNP, Departement of Defece Colombia, Fundación Páis Libre, Cifras y Conceptos and Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica.

Foreigners have not been absent in this type of terrorism in Colombia. There are 1,051 (this number was 5,563, but is was fixed according to my weekly note on 10th November of 2013) cases reported of foreigners kidnapped in Colombia since 1970; it means 10.1% of total people kidnapped since 1970. The worst years for foreigners in Colombia were between 2005 and 2010 when the annual rate of foreigners kidnapped were between 239 people and 918 people. The main foreigners kidnapped came from Venezuela with 17.0% of total foreigners kidnapped since 1970, the United States with 14.8%, Italy with 6.5%, Germany with 5.6%, and Spain with 5.5% as figure 3 shows. Fortunately, this rate has shown a decline since 2011 when the Pace Meetings start taking place; the number of foreigners kidnapped in 2011 were 10, and 4 in 2012. Of course, just one kidnaped is clear evidence of lacking of security and strong lacking of understanding of Human Rights in a society. This information comes from public data broadcasted by private and public colombian agencies Cifras y Conceptos and Centro Memoria Histórica; these two agencies have accurately information from 1970 to 2010; and Fundación País Libre has partial information for 2011 to 2012.

Figure 3. Source country of foreigners kidnapped in Colombia 1970-2012
(% of total foreigners kidnapped)
Source: DNP, Departement of Defece Colombia, Fundación Páis Libre, Cifras y Conceptos and Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica.

Relation between unemployment and people kidnapped in Colombia

It is a clear evidence that as the inflation rate shows a decline due to monetary policies, the unemployment rate shows an increase. This evidence comes from many countries and Colombia is into this group. The issue is Colombian economic authorities started to work on low inflation rate while the country faced the worst internal war, so it was such put out fire with gas!. The increase in unemployment rate pushed low income people to do terrorism acts such as kidnaping. It is fair to remember that income distribution in Colombia is unfair in deep; people in poverty state are 32.7% of total population in 2012, and a GINI coefficient of 0.539 in 2012; by 1990 these indicators were worse!!. Therefore, when the costs of low inflation are taking into account, the people kidnapped have to be in this account. An econometric model shows that the reduction of inflation in 1.0% points brings an increase of unemployment rate of 0.14% points, but an increase in unemployment rate of 1.0% pushes up the kidnapping rate in 0.48% points; figure 4 shows the relation between unemployment and kidnapping in Colombia; it is clear evidence of a positive relation. These result have to be taken into account to a successful Peace Meetings because there are approximately 8,500 people in guerrilla troops in 2013 who can fell in this type of terrorism. Therefore, there is a strong challenge for Labour Minister, Central Bank of Colombia and private firms for giving job opportunities to colombians if we are really interested to achieve a Colombia in peace.

Figure 4. Total population kidnapped and people under unemployment state in Colombia 1964-2012
(Variables under natural logarithm)
Source: Bureau Os Statistics Colombia, DNP, Departement of Defece Colombia, Fundación Páis Libre, Cifras y Conceptos and Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. Own calculations Stata 12.1.